readtech.com - Article: Limiting the Use of QSECOFR
read technologies, inc.

SkyViewPolicy Minder for OS/400

 
Upcoming WEB Event

Topics include:

  • Cutting the Cost of Compliance
  • Saving you Time


Policy Minder for i5/OS & IBM i
Risk Assessor for i5/OS & OS/400
SkyView Security Check-Up
Halcyon
RSWeb
 
How to Buy

Article:

Limiting the Use of QSECOFR

SkyView Partners Security News

by Carol Woodbury
28 Nov 2006

 

Here is your iSeries security tip for November, 2006 from SkyView Partners, Inc., World Class i5/OS and OS/400 Security Experts.

When working with our clients, one of the topics that often arises is the use of QSECOFR. The question usually posed to me is, “When and by whom is its use appropriate?” Good question! Let’s examine some of the considerations.

First, you should only sign as QSECOFR when the process requires it. Those processes include upgrading the operating system or when you’re in disaster recovery mode. You shouldn’t have to sign on to install third-party applications unless the vendor has irresponsibly hard- coded their installation routine to check that “QSECOFR” is running the process. Then (obviously) you have no choice but to sign on as QSECOFR to perform the procedure.

Why limit the use of QSECOFR? Because it is rare that the QSECOFR password is known by only one person. When more than one person knows the password, accountability is lost. In other words, while all of the i5/OS audit entries log the fact that QSECOFR performed a task, how do you know who really performed the task?

But I can hear the protests now. “There are times,” you say, “when the power of QSECOFR is required to perform a task.” Very true. There are times when *ALLOBJ and/or *SECADM are required. In fact, this is usually the case for security administrator tasks. So instead of allowing multiple users to sign on as “QSECOFR”, what do you do? You can either give users the necessary special authorities in their own profile or you can make users a member of the QSECOFR profile. (Giving the user the special authorities in their own profile is a slightly more secure implementation but making them a member of QSECOFR is usually slightly more convenient.)

If multiple users in your organization have knowledge of the QSECOFR password, I strongly encourage you to modify your practices and create an individual profile for each person requiring the power of the QSECOFR profile.

Want to know that your system EXACTLY matches your security policy requirements?

Policy Minder Tip - Tracking Powerful Users.

Starting your Christmas list?
You might want to add a 30- day free trial of the newest version of SkyView Policy Minder to your list!

Policy Minder version 1.2 offers some significant time-saving enhancements including:

Create templates to discover “new” powerful users.

Whether you make your powerful users a member of QSECOFR or assign them *ALLOBJ directly, consider using a Policy Minder *USRPRF (user profile) template to keep track of all of the users with that power.

From the Main menu, take option 1=Work with Policies. Take option 5 on the *USRPRF category. Press F6=Create to create a new user profile template. On this first screen you define which users to include in the template. You can include users in four different ways – their user profile name (or a generic name), the user class they belong to, all of the members of a particular group profile or all users with a particular special authority. (If you don’t remember the various ways to include profiles, press F4=List and select from the list.)

To keep track of the users that have been assigned *ALLOBJ, specify *ALLOBJ in the Name field and *SPCAUT in the Type field. Scroll down. At the top of the next page, you will want to take advantage of the new Policy Minder 1.2 feature “New profile allowed” and specify “*NO”. Keep rolling down until you come back to the Work with Policies – User profiles display. Now run a compliance check on this policy (You can run a compliance check through the Main menu option 2=Work with Compliance or by running the CHECK command in the SKYVIEWPMP library.) This compliance check establishes a baseline of the profiles that currently are assigned *ALLOBJ. The next time you run a compliance check against this template, if any additional users are found to have *ALLOBJ, they will be flagged as “out of compliance.” This allows you to review the list and make sure all of the assignments are appropriate. If they are, you can “Accept new” to add the profile to the policy.

Keeping track of the users that are in the QSECOFR group (or any other group, for that matter), is the same process as described above. You simply specify the profiles to be included in the template slightly differently. In this case you specify the name of the group profile (for example, QSECOFR) for the Name and specify *GRPPRF for the Type

Want to know more about SkyView Policy Minder? Join a webinar

Are you overwhelmed with the details of managing your security policy compliance requirements? Let SkyView Policy Minder automate that process. IBM thought enough of SkyView products to certify them as ‘Server Proven” and as “i5/OS ready”.

Sincerely,

Carol Woodbury
SkyView Partners, Inc.

 

About the author
Carol Woodbury is co-founder of SkyView Partners, Inc., a firm specializing in security compliance management and assessment software as well as security services. Carol is the former chief security architect for AS/400 for IBM in Rochester, Minnesota, and has specialized in security architecture, design, and consulting for more than 15 years. Carol speaks around the world on a variety of security topics and is coauthor of the book Experts' Guide to OS/400 and i5/OS Security.

 

SPECIAL OFFERS

Easy Online Meetings – Anytime, Anywhere
Easy Online Meetings – Anytime, Anywhere
Read Less.  Learn More.
Send Faxes.  Receive Faxes.  Anywhere You Can Email.
Never Go To the Post Office Again

 

 

Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Read Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved.